Cited by 110Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion Recognition by Children With Down Syndrome: Investigation of Specific Impairments and Error Patterns

Williams, Katie R., Wishart, Jennifer G., Pitcairn, Tom K., Willis, Diane S.·2005·American Journal on Mental Retardation

Abstract

The ability of children with Down syndrome to recognize expressions of emotion was compared to performance in typically developing and nonspecific intellectual disability groups matched on either MA or a performance-related measure. Our goal was to (a) resolve whether specific emotions present recognition difficulties; (b) investigate patterns of errors; and (c) explore the relationships among emotion-recognition ability and cognitive, linguistic, and adaptive behavior levels. Emotion-recognition ability in the Down syndrome group was significantly poorer than in the typically developing group overall, particularly for fearful expressions. Error patterns and relationships between task performance and assessment measures also differed across groups. Findings are consistent with a neurological explanation of specific deficits in sociocognitive functioning in children with Down syndrome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[378:erbcwd]2.0.co;2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Metadata

Authors
Williams, K. R., Wishart, J. G., Pitcairn, T. K., & Willis, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
American Journal on Mental Retardation
Published
2005
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
378
ISSN
0895-8017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164407551
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Mental Retardation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
Down syndrome, emotion recognition, facial expressions, emotional expression, error patterns, intellectual disability, cognitive ability, language skills, adaptive behavior, typically developing children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Child, Cognition Disorders, Communication Disorders, Down Syndrome, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Language Disorders, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review